The Bill of Rights Amendment VI (six), or who is running this show?

Remember, we are a self governed people.  That means that we have a government that serves us, not
the other way around.  The nature of a government that can get all the money it wants uses that money
to gain power over the people.  Then. it has its lawyers to take power from the people and give that power
to themselves.  Here is a good example.

Amendment 5
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime,
unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising
in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time
of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense
to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any
criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of

 law;
 nor shall private property be
taken for public use, without just compensation."

"on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury..."

 An Indictment is handed down when a case is presented to the Grand Jury by a prosecutor.
A Presentment is handed down when the Grand Jury takes an independent action that originates
in the jury.

    You see, a Grand jury can investigate the government without tipping it off by having a
government lawyer in the room.  This represents another way for the people to have the power
over this government.  Can't have that!
    Here is what they did:
    In 1946 the lawyers in Washington wrote up the "Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure."
Say what?
In rule #7 no mention of presentments.
Rule #4  Says that as far as Federal Courts are concerned, presentments are obsolete.
rule #6 says that independent Grand Jury investigations cause a "run-away" Grand

 Jury
further
 denigrating the Grand Jury, and the people in general.
    By now, I don't have to tell you that this is an act of war.  Any time one of our rights
gets attacked, it is an act of war on we the people.
    Here is the 1828 definition of a capital crime: "Capital crime, a crime punishable with
death."  Now you know why they want to do away with the death penalty.  It goes and then no
more cases have to go to a Grand Jury to be prosecuted.  Life W/O parole is the order of the
day.
    You can not be tried twice for the same crime.  Great Britain was infamous for trying an
individual until they got the desired results.  We said enough of that and stated here that you
get one crack at us and that's it.
    You cannot be compelled to be a witness against yourself: COMPELLED, pp.  "Forced;
constrained; obliged."  The word 'compelled' was completely removed from the 1913 edition of
 the
new
 "Webster's
 Dictionary."
    When a cop takes your property because drugs were found there, he has just
 violated your right to due process.
    Just compensation for your property has been added to by the Federal government when they
say they have "imminent domain."  That term is not in our Constitution.  If the Federal wants
a piece of property in one of the States, it has to have the permission of that State.
    Because we don't study and understand our rights it's voila, stroke of the pen and another
power shift takes place in favor of the criminals.

 Note:   Why the 1828 Dictionary?  The first "Blacks Law Dictionary wasn't published until
1891, a hundred years after the writing of our Constitution.
    Daniel Webster was the expounder of our Constitution, and his Dictionary was in the works
for seventy years before being published 1828.

Citizen

 Conway