Amendment Seven
Our experiment in self rule can not succeed. Our republican form of government with the rule of common law is like cancer for the ruling elite. We not only have to fail, we have to be made an example of. Now you know why they are after the guns. We citizens have a test before us, and that is, do we fight for our liberty or not? One of the tactics of our enemy is redefining the terms in our contract with government, our Constitution. The following is an example.
Fundamental #17
Today, your VII Amendment to the Bill of Rights.
Amendment 7
“In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.” Consider yourselves among the very few that have ever read your Bill of Rights at all. I gave a speech to over three hundred (wannabe) citizens. I asked for a show of hands if they had ever read the Bill of Rights. None were raised. When we decided to let government take over the education of our children, this is the end result. This from Ben Franklin: “A man who has been taught to know and prize the rights that God has given him cannot be enslaved it is the region of ignorance that tyranny begins.” This VII “Right” speaks volumes. It says that in matters of twenty dollars or more we are entitled to a trial by jury. The twenty dollars referred to here was a Spanish rolled coin of 271.25 grains of silver, a hefty sum in those days indeed. The next part of this ‘right’ has some very important legal terms. Lets look at the jury first. We don’t need seven lawyers to define our rights for us, we just need a dictionary.The 1913 edition is the tyrants edition. The 1828 edition is ours.
1913 edition: Ju”ry (?), n.; pl. Juries (#) . [OF. jurée an assize, fr. jurer to swear, L. jurare , jurari ;
akin to jus , juris , right, law. See Just,a., and cf. Jurat, Abjure.]
1. (Law) A body of men, usually twelve, selected according to law, impaneled and sworn to inquire into
and try any matter of fact, and to render their true verdict according to the evidence legally adduced.
See Grand jury under Grand, and Inquest.
Displaying 1 result(s) from the 1828 edition:
JU”RY, n. [L. juro, to swear.] A number of freeholders, selected in the manner prescribed by law, empaneled and sworn to inquire into and try any matter of fact, and to declare the truth on the evidence given them in the case. Grand juries consist usually of twenty four freeholders at least, and are summoned to try matters alleged in indictments. Petty juries, consisting usually of twelve men, attend courts to try matters of fact in civil causes, and to decide both the law and the fact in criminal prosecutions. The decision of a petty jury is called a verdict. (bold mine)
Here are the supreme Court rulings based on this definition Georgia V. Brailsford (1794) “A jury has the power to judge the law in bringing a general verdict.” 3.US,1 (Dall) Here is the nail in our coffi: Sparf & Hanson V. U.S. “Jurors do not need to be informed of their power to judge the law in bringing a general verdict.” 156 U,S. 51,64C (1895) You are supposed to already know this! This will explain how this power can be used to take back our republic.
THE JURY, STUPID
ever yet imagined by men, by which the government …
freedomlaw.com/JRPSTUPID.html – 35k
- Do everything you have agreed to do. (the basics of contract law)
- Do not encroach onto anther’s liberty or property. (the basics of civil and some criminal law)

